Escape of water: where must the water come from?
Escape-of-water cover generally depends on water leaving supply or drainage pipes or connected equipment. The proven cause matters, not merely the presence of water.
Official RIS decision →Verified Supreme Court decisions covering the main private insurance lines.
Selected verified decisions with practical context.
Escape-of-water cover generally depends on water leaving supply or drainage pipes or connected equipment. The proven cause matters, not merely the presence of water.
Official RIS decision →The Court focused on the policy definition of escape of water and its direct effect on insured property. Pipe damage, consequential loss and excluded causes must be distinguished.
Official RIS decision →Although proof may be eased in burglary claims, the circumstances must still make an insured burglary probable. Locks, keys, traces and prompt documentation may be decisive.
Official RIS decision →The Court considered a settlement method based solely on a floor-area aid. Valuation method, sum insured and any underinsurance waiver must fit together.
Official RIS decision →Under a reinstatement clause, full replacement-value payment may depend on actual rebuilding or sufficiently secured reinstatement.
Official RIS decision →Gross negligence requires particularly careless conduct. Any reduction or refusal depends on the facts and the policy wording.
Official RIS decision →Selected verified decisions with practical context.
Where such a deadline is agreed, possible permanent disability must be claimed and medically supported in time. The period generally starts on the accident date.
Official RIS decision →Permanent disability requires a lifelong impairment or a medically supported prognosis that it will probably remain for life. The relevant assessment date matters.
Official RIS decision →Policy terms distinguish temporary from lifelong impairment. The long-term prognosis is central to capital or pension benefits.
Official RIS decision →A different degree of disability is considered only if reassessment is requested within the contractual period. Deadline management is therefore essential.
Official RIS decision →The Court examined whether an external event and resulting injury met the contractual accident definition. A suddenly noticed complaint is not automatically an insured accident.
Official RIS decision →For an agreed daily allowance, the relevant occupation or activity against which complete incapacity is measured depends on the exact policy wording.
Official RIS decision →Selected verified decisions with practical context.
The decisive event is usually the first alleged breach of a legal duty, not the later lawyer’s letter or court action. Cover purchased afterwards may therefore be too late.
Official RIS decision →Coverage may depend on the facts and legal basis alleged by the opponent. The insured event is not determined solely by the policyholder’s own legal view.
Official RIS decision →The Court distinguished limitation periods, contractual exclusion periods and late knowledge. Legal-expenses matters should be reported promptly and placed accurately in time.
Official RIS decision →Selected verified decisions with practical context.
The actual sequence, a sudden external impact and the contractual accident definition are decisive. Calling an event an “accident” in everyday language is not enough.
Official RIS decision →A typical sequence, such as properly parking a vehicle and later finding it missing, may initially support proof of theft, but contradictions and counter-indications remain relevant.
Official RIS decision →Leaving the scene may breach contractual duties to clarify the event. This can have insurance consequences even if the criminal-law assessment differs.
Official RIS decision →Selected verified decisions with practical context.
Occupational disability insurance is intended to prevent social decline when occupational capacity is lost prematurely. The occupation actually performed most recently is decisive.
Official RIS decision →Occupational disability cover is a fixed-benefit insurance. Once the contractual insured event occurs, the agreed benefit does not depend on proof of a specific income loss.
Official RIS decision →Referral requires an occupation sufficiently comparable in training, experience, social status and income. A broad job title alone is not enough.
Official RIS decision →Selected verified decisions with practical context.
A mere reference to a tariff may be insufficient to explain surrender values. Costs, long-term effects and early termination must be understandable.
Official RIS decision →The Court reviewed terms of a unit-linked life policy. Costs, investment risk, policy changes and surrender values are central to long-term provision.
Official RIS decision →The obligation to pay is linked to the agreed event, such as maturity or death. Policy type, beneficiary rights and due date must be considered separately.
Official RIS decision →Selected verified decisions with practical context.
Policy terms may require illness or inability to travel to be confirmed immediately by a doctor. Documentation at the destination can therefore be decisive.
Official RIS decision →Documents must make clear with whom the insurance contract is concluded and what benefit is agreed. Unclear roles of intermediary and insurer may be legally problematic.
Official RIS decision →The Court considered contractual evidence and deadlines in cancellation or trip-interruption claims. Prompt notification and medical records are particularly important.
Official RIS decision →The full judgment, the individual policy and the facts remain decisive.